Loading...

I was surprised at how Amstradi worked so well. My only problems were the loss size and the rules that I don't know, because the amateur is so much different than broadcaster, you know, that's basically it. All the first stuff, which was all, you know, mainly finer specs of FM main channel carrier, frequency accuracy and AM, you know, like 20 hertz and two kilohertz, I believe, for three liter FM on channel, you know, should be there. And, you know, now with all the digital sub-carriers and the mask for digital, I found the most interesting stuff to be what was developed after I left King 5, which is the MPLS duplication you have to do for TV or ATSC transport stream, having all the sub-channels and all the descriptive track and everything in that encoded. And the same for HD radio with three or four channels and all the RDS on it. And so that's been good. You know, interesting to know that was a CBC still has HD sub-carriers through the fog of my 88.1 reception for Bashan from South Sound. sound, and when conditions are right, the HD pops in with my three meter log periodic, I guess it is, it's a TV antenna, supposedly. So yeah, back to you and the second class, yeah, it was all multiple choice there and I think the decimal differences in the math, orders of magnitude differences were mostly the answer. I think if they had something like Sam's study guide, it would probably work very well.