Transcript detail

Loading...

Public transcript context with linked callsigns, related nets, and analysis metadata.

Back to transcripts
-Node
-Created
-Confidence
-AI Passes
-Analysis Steps

Transcript

Public transcript text

okay thank you I appreciate that so you were talking about these boats in the water getting blown out of the water and of course Trump claimed that there was drugs on board and there was a rating proof but they carried out the order later down the road they've come to find out I think it's like 78 boats they've blown out of the water now had nothing to do with drugs you know that could be real problem. And you're right, it wouldn't be the enlisted that are actually carrying out the order because they don't know would be the admiralty or so forth like that. They had a rumor everybody heard about, Alvin Hausley, which was a four-star general or Admiral, excuse me, and he quit just about the time that started and he was he was in charge of that operation down there and it was rumored that he did because he didn't he thought it was an unlawful order bought from the president and and he wasn't going to get into that kind of deal he just assumed that you just retired the hell with it and let somebody else do the dirty work but when it comes right down to it that was not a verified report he never made that statement it was all speculation on on these people's part but you know you were talking about refusing to carry out an order which is interesting because I was we're doing some research on something else and I'll talk about in just a second but yeah you can be charged under article 90 article 92 and article 99 and receive up to believe seven years altogether for disobeying me an order. So, there you go. Anyways, the reason why I'm researching all this kind of stuff is I was checking my email to do a reset and I get letters from the VA all the time. And this one, you know, it's the VA news and they send them to me like I got one, two, three, four, four VA's. Their mail is just since the 19th of this month. And one was to confirm an an appointment that I was gonna have today. And so you consider it legitimate, you know, when they put something out there and this one thing was President Trump's real estate's GI Bill benefits for veterans discharged for refusing COVID vaccine. So I went to the article, I read it and then I put it in chat GPT and this is where the rabbit hole began. And it's a good article. I read it all the way through. I understood what they were talking about. Another reset. And actually, this is about ChatGBT more than it is about the article itself, just so you know. Because I had a very interesting conversation with ChatGBT. And it goes, well, there's some major red flags that says the Department of War does not exist, which is true. It was demolished in 1947. And, you know, it was, you know, Trump called it the Department of War, but its real name is still the Department of Defense. I'm not going to argue with that, but it made it as, okay, the VA is not supposed to be saying the Department of War. And then number two, they say it's a scam, it's because Pete Hexeth is not the Secretary of anything, he's just a Fox News host. Okay. And they have said our executive order, because it didn't announce the executive order as 14-18-4, did not exist. Never did. There's no record of it. And then they said the tone is wildly unprofessional for the VA. Authoritarian COVID mandate, illegal vaccine mandate, the fact of our military perfect health. It basically was saying that just everything that the whole article was talking about was nonsense, it didn't even have proper grammar in it, so forth like that, right? Bottom line, it said the pieces of manufactured political content, this is a piece of manufactured content written to look like an official government announcement, But it collapses under even a basic scrutiny. But it looked pretty incredible to me. So, I asked, well, who is Pete Hekseff's... Hekseff. And he goes, oh, well, he's the secretary of... Excuse me. Secretary of Defense. And he's been there since Trump's been in office. and he was nominated, you know, but there were some allegations and stuff like that that he still was confirmed. He gave some things that were kind of controversial, this, that, and the other. But the straight talk is, yeah, he's the Secretary of Defense. So I asked him, I'm just curious why you said that the Secretary of Defense was not in the first place. well I asked him well you just said he was a Fox News reporter why are you not saying he wasn't a Secretary of Defense then they gave me this long kind of bullcrap answer about how you know I thought you were talking about 2024 not 2025 and it came up with all kinds of crap you know well president was in office in 2045 so therefore he couldn't have been secretary but I never said about that. I was talking about 2025 and I gave it just the article that the VA wrote in the first place, right? Finally it came up with, oh, it was just a large argument. No, you're right about PEACACCEP, Department of War doesn't know you this blah blah blah. The conclusions, it basically turned around and said when When it said that the jet order of 14-18-4 didn't exist, now it says it is exist. Pete Heksev, it said he didn't exist, he was just a Fox News host, and now he is the Secretary of Defense. It admitted that. It talked about how, yeah, there was people that did refuse COVID vaccine. And before he said that was a bunch of bologna, I mean, I don't know, Chad GVT had a real big brain fart and it took forever to get her to admit, or him, or it, that it was wrong, it didn't know what the hell it was talking about. When I have days like this, one more reset, I'm sorry. When I have days like this and ChatGPT does what it does sometimes, I lose my mind and I wonder why in the hell am I paying for this service in the first place? This is not just the first time, I've caught it many times doing this and then when I re-question And it changes his mind. Oh, yeah, you're right about this. Oh, yeah, you're right about that. I I don't get it. I don't get it. There's just Josh I keep paying for this to go to something else Back to you Katie zero ma. I'm this is repeater station kilo kilo seven November George my friend you have gone from novice to intermediate level of AI. So you're seeing things now, you're catching things. This is good because you're seeing firsthand how hallucinogenic LLMs can be. Not all LLMs are the same. ChatTBD is actually not terribly bad. Although it seems like to me maybe somewhere along the way it didn't connect with its search function to get up-to-date information. So, let me see if I can help clarify this. I'm going to use ChatCPT as my example for you. ChatCPT 5.1 is the model you probably are using now because it's been rolled out everywhere. And you can see, looking at the top of your thing, you can change your models. You have been using 5.0, but just a few days ago they released 5.1, which is an updated model. It's a lot like the 5.0, you can have more personality, they say. Why that's important is because every time they do that, they tend to update their knowledge base. There's a cutoff date that ChatQBT has knowledge of. They don't release what that date is, they used to, but today is mid-November, so let's Let's say, for simplicity, let's say the cutoff date was September 31st, so that's the cutoff date. So, the CAT GPT 5.1 model only has information up to September 31st. At that point, it has to use a connection to search for up-to-date information. Now, with the models 5 and 5.1, that supposedly is automatic, but it's not. They're still working on how to make that work, because I've caught it doing the same thing many times. So to combat this, what do you do? What I do is I check it against another chatbot, Gemini, or, in fact, I haven't mentioned it much because I'm still getting used to it, but I've been using Clod for the last two weeks. And I'm telling you what, it is quickly becoming my favorite. I am so impressed with it. So, George, I would say, yes, you're doing the right thing. You're asking the right things. Yes, it's messing with you. You can do a couple of things in your prompt, okay? So when you ask it things, one, you can be specific about things. That helps it out a great deal. And the second thing you can do is tell it, I want no hallucinations, web search if you need to. And what that does is that instructs the bot to bring you the most current information available. That may help you a lot. Let me take a real quick pause here.

Explore

Linked public records