Loading...

Like I say, with all due respect, I'm not trying to disagree or nothing, but it goes both ways, right? Right now the government is shut down, but the military is still getting paid. ISIS is obviously still getting paid. The government has still got a lot of stuff going on. I mean the project at the White House with the reconstruction or construction of this ballroom is continuing. There's military blowing ships out of the water with missiles. That's government related. You know, couldn't they just say, okay, we'll still continue to keep everything the way it's going, but like at least let our people eat. So can we at least push this through? Has there been a suggestion that, okay, we got a stalemate here? Yes. But is it fair to let people go hungry as a result of that? And that's what I think they really got to think about. You know, has that been discussed or like at least don't let people starve?