Transcript detail

Loading...

Public transcript context with linked callsigns, related nets, and analysis metadata.

Back to transcripts
-Node
-Created
-Confidence
-AI Passes
-Analysis Steps

Transcript

Public transcript text

Okay, Gray, very good. Sorry about that. I know I missed the last question you had for me. I had stepped away and by the time I got back to the device, you went on to the next person, which I don't blame you. So Pam's got up, she's got the news on, and there's a lot going on here. So, to answer your question, I think I'm going to have to go back to the device. I don't see how they could fire people that made the comments and not fire the original person that started it. So, I mean, if the person that initially made the comment and he's still employed, how can they fire the other people that made the comments? I don't know. To me, I just can't see all these bad comments coming in about Charlie Kirk. That just blows my mind. But, illegal? I'm going to say no. Morally, I just can't see why if several people got fired, then why is the guy that actually started the thing still employed? So, that's a tough one. That is definitely a tough one. Let me turn it back to you and see what other people's thoughts are. NAYQJ? NAYQJ, I must have read it wrong to give you that impression. I apologize. We're talking about the original person who had a negative comment about Charlie Kirk. They're getting fired or punished. So, do you want to change your answer on that?

Explore

Linked public records