Loading...

KC1UGK, this is KC2PKG. You know, I'm a huge fan of submarines. The ones that are on display now are all World War II, and there is nothing soft inside a World War II submarine, nothing at all. So many ways to hit something, bang something, I think it must be the hardest part of the job. One, you're sealed up under the water, and two, there's nothing soft in there. And I'm actually literally looking forward to when we're able to walk through a much more modern submarine, which are much roomier. They have stairs inside and stuff like that, not just ladders. I want to see what the new ones are like. Are there soft things there? I think there are. Okay, well let's get to the real questions here. The real question, the first one, I was reading about this last week, and actually I've been reading about it for about two weeks now, because of the involvement of the ACLU. And that is people who made comments about Charlie Kirk on Facebook, on X, on other, to social, that were at all negative, came under attack. And that's something, it's a name and shame thing that we've gotten into in the last 10 years, where somebody's offended by your comment, and people come out of the woodwork to call you or write comments about you. And in this case, over 100 people, their employers were called. And they got fired. They got fired or punished for the comments that they made online. The question is this, over 100 people lost their jobs over comments they made about Charlie Kirk on social media. Other users banded together and flooded the employers with comments, emails, phone calls, demanding the firing of the original commenter. Should that be illegal? And how do you feel about free speech in that case? We'll pass that to Ralph, N8YQJ Ralph. This is KC2PKG.