Loading...

You know, I did see that you put some stuff on there, and because I've got up like right at nap time, I have not done anything on Discord at all, but I will today at some point. I got a busy ass morning, so I've got to do some stupid stuff that I don't want to do, but I don't look at it. And my point, let me try to be a little clearer, is I try to get everybody who uses AI, any type of AI, to use it as a resource. I'm desperately afraid that humankind, me too, because I've caught myself doing this more than once, that humankind is going to rely too much on it. You know what I mean? I mean, it's easy to say, tell, you know, okay, here's an example. If I really wanted to be ugly and just be a complete a-hole, I love saying a-hole because it makes me think of Nicolas Cage. I could easily take whatever we talk about, whether it's on Discord, whether it's on the net, because you could always, I don't know if you all know this, you can take Wonder Life, set it up next to, I'll use ChatGPD because that's what I use the most, and it will actually listen and transcribe it live. I mean, just sit on the phone next to it so it can hear it. So yeah, you could theoretically use an AI to do all of your communication. I am afraid, you know, most people are going to start doing that at some point. They're going to get lazy. They're going to forget how to form sentences. They're going to forget how to use grammar. They're going to forget how to think for themselves. I'm not saying that on you, George, at all. I'm saying humanity as a whole. That's what I'm desperately afraid of. And I guess that's what I was trying to say last night, but because I'm an a-hole, it doesn't come out very well. But I do appreciate you not being offended. That's really trying not to offend anybody, but I get told I offend people because I'm blunt. Let me take a real quick break because my grandkids are both pulling me over to the street and telling me to look at something. Give me one second, please. I'm going to take an opportunity to go ahead and say one more thing since you're needing a break. Well, if you look at my writings on my website, these are my own writings. So you will understand that verbally I'm not the best, but when I write, I write well. So take a look there and you'll know that I have plenty of skills for writing. And I was also curious, did you look at it was a posting before I had posted the rebuttal in Texas about the how I came to the conclusion that only 33% voted for Trump? And that's another unique thing about AI. If you ask one question one way and you ask it a different way, or you break it down saying, hey, how many people are voters in the United States? How many were, you know, what was the percentages of people that did vote for Trump and this, that, and the other? You find out that it's not the what was it? Because I want to make sure I don't. It's not like 52.5% or something like that. I can't exactly, oh no, it was 49.8%. 77.3 million Americans had voted for Trump. But in actuality, when you do the math and you find out that one third of the nation didn't vote and you're only counting two thirds of the nation that did vote, it came down to 33% for Trump and 32% for Harris. I want to vote for somebody else. And 34% didn't vote at all. I found that really fascinating. But like I said before, it really depends on how you ask the question, what information you give AI on the answers that you'll come up with. And that's, I think that's more of a challenge than anything else to get the right information. KB0MAI.