Loading...

Well, what a nice thing for her to say. 75, that's interesting. I'm glad you looked that up. Thank you so much, Alan. So Bill, it seems I need to, I'm going to start, I'm going to open up a new channel on Discord. Or maybe use the controversial channel. I think there's one that we have there. I'll start, Bill, and you can too, start posting some of the links to some of these things that you and I are seeing and reading. That way, you know, Gray and George and whoever else would like to see that would have the opportunity to see it. You know, I'll be honest with everybody. Part of the problem I really honestly think is going on in the world today, especially with social media and the internet, is algorithms. I think most things, including YouTube, including Facebook, including X, including them all, their algorithm is geared to bring you more of what you want to see. So if I'll use me as an example, I'm a center right leaning conservative. I don't know how to explain what it is I really am, other than an asshole. But I typically get that type of content. Because that's what I research, right? I want to look up more libertarian things. I want to look up more conspiratorial things, I guess is a good way to put it. Not to be crazy, but most conspiratorial things have a foundation in some sort of truth. You know, I've talked about it on here before, the new UK ID, mandatory digital ID. We haven't talked about it, but I've mentioned it. You know, I see things like that and I see a dystopian future for the world. And that's what I'm seeing right now in the United States. And I don't blame the left. I don't blame the right. I blame humanity. I mean, that's what we do. When you run over, you've seen civilizations get too big and fall. And I think we've done that. I do have a question. And we are getting close to Rick, I think, left. And then we're going to do our 73 rounds. I don't know if we should talk about it, or 73 rounds, or hold off. But I kind of have a, I guess it's a statement of sorts. No, it's a question of sorts. Why does the federal government provide charity, entitlements? Why? From my research over the last couple of days, that really didn't start until the 30s, you know, the Great Depression. And that's whenever governments started putting their hand into giving or providing. This is repeater station... Sorry, I was timing out. So I'm not entirely sure, other than the laws that have been passed since then, I'm not entirely sure that's constitutional. The more and more I read about it, the more and more I'm pretty sure it's not constitutional. However, the precedent has been set, therefore it has become legal. Anyhow, it's really interesting to think about that up until the 1930s, so less than 100 years ago, we didn't, it wasn't the government's responsibility to make sure everybody was fed. It wasn't the government's responsibility to make sure everybody had health care. It wasn't the government's responsibility to make sure that, you know, poor people got to lift up. It just wasn't. And I would almost argue at this point that it's still not the government's responsibility. It's not constitutional. Now, that sounds harsh and mean, and I'm just strictly speaking on the constitutional side. In my heart, I'm glad they're helping people. People need help, and humanity lacks that far too often. I'm just strictly speaking on the legal, constitutional aspect of it. I don't think it's constitutional. And so I think that's going to be a very unpopular opinion. But that's what it is, an opinion. So Rick, K9, PFT, if you're still with us, unless you have your say, and then we're going to start the 73 round.