Loading...

Well, thank you so much, Miss D. Thank you very much. And oh, I just lost my train of thought. It was there and then it was gone. Yeah, you're talking about how I didn't understand the whole stuff. You're right. You're absolutely right. That's kind of why I look up other countries too, really what I'm trying to understand is to give me a contrasting view. That's what kind of surprised me about Canada and especially the UK. Canada is not nearly as bad as the UK is in my mind. But yeah, it helps me to understand the stark differences between what we have versus what other, I say this with quotations, free countries have. I mean, in actuality, none of us are completely free, right? That would be completely anarchy. So it's just an interesting thought. You know, something I didn't realize and I won't go too deep into it now. I guess now I do realize, but the easiest way for me to understand the differences between, let's say the United States and Canada, just limit to that, is that the free speech in the United States is nearly untouchable. It's nearly mythic. It is the law of the land. We the people have made it such an important part of our existence that if somebody attacks it, there's going to be some trouble. I mean, it's untouchable pretty much. In Canada, free expression is strong. It's not as strong because it does bend when it records things that society is better off with the limits. That was a big difference. So Canada has mechanisms built in to limit the expressions based on society's needs. The United States doesn't. And so that's what I found to be completely interesting. Okay. Well, I don't know if free speech is talked about or not, but we can talk about anything going forward if anybody would like. Peter just checked out and Miss D just checked out. And it is that time on Friday where we do start dropping, but we also start picking people up. I have Mike, WA6ABC next. So Mike, why don't you go ahead?