Loading...

You have done such a better job of explaining that than I would have. Great job, Gray, because you're absolutely 100% correct. We both completely seem to agree on the free speech rights. He's right, folks. It's set for government. It's not set for individuals. Your freedom of expression is against the United States government and the states. And the states. And that includes federal, local, county, and the United States. They're all forms of government. So your free speech is only protected against that. Again, like Gray said, if you put something on Facebook that your company doesn't like, ciao, see you later. They have that right in almost every United States. I think there may be a couple of states that are different. And Texas, I can speak for itself, has the right to work, which is what most of the country has, meaning they can fire you for no reason at all if they wanted to. I mean, it's just the way it is. But the speech is a big part of that. So let's say Jimmy Kimmel. We'll use that as our casebook example since it's so fresh in all of our minds. What happened with Jimmy Kimmel is, well, illegal in my mind. The government, under veil of threat, tried to coerce Jimmy Kimmel, ABC, Disney, and whoever else and tried to limit his free speech, or their free speech is a better way to use it, or free speech. I'm not a Jimmy Kimmel fan. Never have been, really. I don't watch them. I didn't watch the show when he came back on the air after his suspension. I don't plan to watch them in the future. But that doesn't mean I want to take away his right to free speech in America. And so, you know, yeah, I grew up hearing about free speech. I grew up going to school back in the 80s and 90s. They actually had OK civics classes back then. But I've learned a great deal about the latitude of free speech that we have in the United States and how it covers and what it doesn't cover just in the past couple of weeks because of Jimmy Kimmel. Taking a really cool online course that some of you may like or may not like, I don't know, but it's all about the Constitution. And having stands as the first amendment to the Constitution is about free speech. So there you go. But they correct, incitement to imminent lawless action. You can't stand on the street corner and urge people to commit crimes right now. You can't stand on the street corner and tell that person, hey, go kick that dude in the head. That's illegal. That's not free speech. Let's take a quick pause. OK, true threats. Speech where a reasonable person would see it as a serious expression of intent to commit violence. That's exactly the definition that I pulled up. Speech where a reasonable person would see it as a serious expression of an intent to commit violence. Obscenity. Hardcore sexual material with no redeeming social, artistic, political, or scientific value. It's called the Miller test. I'm going to say those four things again. Social, artistic, political, or scientific value. It doesn't have any of those redeeming qualities. The Miller test asks a couple of things. I found this one interesting. Does the average person find it appeals to a pure interest? Does it detect sexual conduct in an offensive way? That's defined by state law. Not federal law, state law. It doesn't lack serious literature, artistic, political, or scientific value. If it doesn't pass those tests, it's not protected. And then the final one is defamation, liable and slander, which is interesting because that's what Trump has been using to sue media companies. ABC being one of them. He's using the Constitution and his right to sue them. There are a lot of people against it, but again, he's within the bounds of the law and he's doing what the constitution allows him to do. Different mission, defamation in my definition says, or the one I looked up says false statements of fact that damages somebody's reputation. And I think that that's a big one right now because it's being tested, it's being used, whether you call it law fair or not. It's within the constitution, so it's protected. The federal government, the state government, local governments, they can't do nothing about it if that's a true thing. Now all of that to say, it doesn't matter if it's personal. Your free speech is not protected today. So with that, let's move it on down to Bill and I'm going to try to talk less about this. I love talking about stuff like this. So Bill, the mic is yours. November 9, OFU.