Transcript detail

Loading...

Public transcript context with linked callsigns, related nets, and analysis metadata.

Back to transcripts
-Node
-Created
-Confidence
-AI Passes
-Analysis Steps

Transcript

Public transcript text

Yeah, thank you, Russell. And yeah, Greg, I think you're right, man. Right now, the laws are being handled and not the way they should be handled. And I heard something yesterday about a new law that's also been signed in the United States regarding hate speech. And that the government says that if you exhibit any hate speech, you will be imprisoned. Canada has a very similar law. The UK has something very similar. In the UK, I believe someone actually put in jail for re-sharing a post that someone else made, even. I think laws like this are dangerous. They encroach on freedom of speech. And I think that when you give the government the ability to decide what is hate speech and what's not, there's a difference between hate speech and speech that you hate. And I think a lot of this stuff is people are getting upset because they're hearing speech that they hate, and they're defining it as hate speech. I don't think that's right either. Someone wants to check that. I heard something yesterday. I heard something about a new law in the United States, a new hate speech law. Someone wants to comment on that with some more accurate information. I'd love to hear it. I just think what's going on right now, people are not noticing it enough. And for the record, guys, I'm not American. I am not Republican or Democrat. I see things from each side that I like and dislike. And what I'm seeing coming out of Trump's White House right now in levelling government agencies and government entities at media organisations, I mean, Trump has sued so many, has filed so many lawsuits just because of things he didn't like that someone said about him. That whole one now against Rupert Murdoch about that letter that he wrote Epstein. So that lawsuit was based on the fact that Trump said there is no letter. They said there was a letter, there is no letter. OK, so we've seen the letter. It's clearly signed by Trump. So how is there even still a lawsuit? How has the judge in there in this matter not tossed that out already based on the fact that we've seen the letter now? We know it exists. His whole case was it didn't exist. Now he's saying he didn't sign it or he didn't write it. But if you look at every compared replica of Trump's signature on that document, do you think someone way back in 2005 said, OK, well, Trump's going to be president in 20 years. We have to engine.

Explore

Linked public records