Transcript detail
Loading...
Public transcript context with linked callsigns, related nets, and analysis metadata.
Transcript
Public transcript text
That's not for ourselves. The China and India pact alone, I didn't do the math but I'm willing to bet it's over half of the world's population. In fact, I'm going to do that so I got to figure it out. I want somebody else to do it while I'm talking. If you take China and India's population, I wonder in comparison to the rest of the world how much of a percentage do they make up? You know, I don't remember if it's a running joke or it's actual training or whatever. I don't remember a long time ago but there is a thing that we talked about if we ever got in the war with China. They had a doctrine, if I remember it, it still may be the official doctrine. They don't supply all their people with rifles. I mean, can you imagine having to make that many weapons and stuff for everybody that could possibly be in the military if you're China or India for that matter? No, they tend to get the first line or two weapons and then once they fall, they send in the replacements and they pick up the weapons that were dropped. Obviously, that is a battlefield doctrine or at least it used to be for China. So that being said, history is repeating itself. It always does to an extent. Whether this turns into something bigger, I don't know. Right now I think it's more about posturing and it's more about not wanting to pay these new tariffs that President Trump has put into place. Could it possibly lead to another world war based off of one man deciding to change tariffs? I don't know. Stranger things have happened in this world. With that, I'm getting back to doing my outside exercise. That's why I took a long time to talk. I needed a break. With that, I'm sending it back over to KC2PKG. Unless V01 UKZ is available, this was KJ5 IRQ.
Explore