Loading...

Alright, I'm back. Okay, so I got a situation for you guys and I'm curious to know. I joined by the way about 45 minutes ago or 50 minutes ago there. So I've been here a while. It's just taken a while to get to the end of the list. Lots of stations here this morning. Okay, so I watched this video. Hypothetical scenario. A kid is in high school and having his lunch stolen every single day by this bully. Okay. So the kid decides, I'm going to retaliate. I'm going to put some laxatives in a cupcake and when this ass steals my lunch, if he does, he's going to eat a cupcake full of laxatives and he's going to crap himself in school. Okay. The parents of this kid freak out, claiming that the kid who made the cupcakes poisoned their son. Okay. Now keep in mind, the kid didn't give this cupcake or intentionally feed this cupcake to this bully. He ended up eating it because he stole the kid's lunch, ate the lunch, ate the cupcake, cracked himself in school. Is the kid who made the cupcake responsible because he made that cupcake? Keep in mind, laxatives I don't think are poison. You know, they're a crapping agent. So my opinion is, had that kid never stolen lunches in the first place, there wouldn't be an issue. And even on the day of the cupcake incident, the cupcake was not fed to this guy or anything. It was stolen and eaten. So who's at fault here? The bully for being an ass stealing kids' lunches or the kid who put the laxatives in the cupcake and literally made him crap all over the classroom? I know it's an interesting one, but I just came across it online and it was like an actual situation this guy I follow went through with his own kid. So I'm just curious because I think this is an interesting situation to be in. So I'll leave that one with you guys. V01U, Daisy.