Transcript detail

Loading...

Public transcript context with linked callsigns, related nets, and analysis metadata.

Back to transcripts
-Node
-Created
-Confidence
-AI Passes
-Analysis Steps

Transcript

Public transcript text

Yeah, wasn't ready. I started doing some other stuff that I was doing this morning when we got interrupted there. But yeah, no, he was, I think Bolton was Trump's ambassador to the UN, maybe, in New York. I think that's what he did, or at least part of what he did. But Bolton has been around for a while. He's been out there. But it's one of these catch 22 situations where in the past there's always been a gentleman's agreement or one side didn't go after the other on certain, I'm not sure what you would call it. But it was just things that one side didn't do to the other politically, political and personal. And when the Democrats went after Trump, they broke a lot of those taboos. And the Trump team turned around and said, well, if you're going to break the taboo, then we'll just follow your lead and we'll do it. Because the Democrats learned a long time ago that it's the process that is the punishment. They went after Mike Flynn, turned out to be totally bogus. But they destroyed his life, destroyed his finances over something that was a non-issue because they didn't like the fact that he was going to be going into Trump's administration. And they knew that he knew where a lot of the bodies lay, so they wanted to get rid of them. But the Democrats in the Senate got rid of the filibuster for judge nominations. And they were all fined doing that until they lost the presidency and they lost the Senate. And then they want to complain because the Republicans are doing it. And it's just like, if you broke it, you bought it. If you're going to take away the protections or the safeguards, you can't then turn around and complain when the other side takes advantage of that. So I see a lot of that going on. You know, they, they, whoops, I'm going to grab one.

Explore

Linked public records