Transcript detail

Loading...

Public transcript context with linked callsigns, related nets, and analysis metadata.

Back to transcripts
-Node
-Created
-Confidence
-AI Passes
-Analysis Steps

Transcript

Public transcript text

Yeah, right, about that, I believe that we should define words and agree on the definition of a word. And words are important. You cannot call Trump a dictator. That's not to say the definition of a dictator. I don't understand. I don't understand that at all. He's not a dictator. Dictators don't act the way Trump does. Dictators want to destroy institutions. And essentially they want to destroy institutions, bring anarchy so they take over the country without institutions. Or they just manipulate the root fear. They change the constitution every ten minutes. That's another dead giveaway. But words have meanings. The other thing is, I hear a lot on the net, the Canadian guys against, or even Canada against, the statement that Trump made that he should be the 51st state. Well, you know, 25% of Canadians actually said it wasn't a bad idea. But I'm not getting at that point. The point that I'm getting at is, a lot of people take Trump's words too seriously. And I think Trump is like an actor. And he's somewhat of a comedian at times. If you read his book, which I did many years ago, you see that one of the careers he was looking into was acting. He did it in his Yerfariyat series. He has somewhat of a sense of humour. He likes to rile people. And they take him too seriously. I simply think it's so emotional and maybe even childish, the reaction that people have against Trump. And that's why they don't have any arguments. They've got to take away the emotional part of it and then start defining terms. And then discussing those terms in a context. And take the other side before they discuss. Back to you. The point of view that they're entertainers and he's an entertainer too. So they know of him as somebody that, well, how could he run a country? They neglect to give any credit because they don't know better to the fact that he's been a shrewd businessman his whole life in spite of the other criticisms. And that's what they do. They take your strengths and then they criticise them so that there's nothing left. And then you don't have an argument because they were in total disagreement. Even though, you know, in his businesses, he has supported a private jet and some awesome places to live. And I don't have to make excuses for anything of his success. That could be construed as a failure. Why, you know, say he's a dictator or breaking the law. And what it is is they were breaking the law. They were the dictators. And it's a good way to confuse things by accusing him of what they're guilty of. Sometimes I have a better way of describing that. Back to you. I think this name calling, I don't think they're dictators either. You know, Ron, I think we have to define what a dictator is. Both are not dictators. I don't think Obama's a dictator. I don't think any of these guys are dictators. But I think the other thing about Trump is when you read his books, he likes to win, you know. And he'll do anything to win. He just likes to win. He started off with a big capital, a capital of two cents, a political capital from his father in our arch city, a real capital. And he takes risks. That's the other part of Trump. He takes a lot of risk. And what I respect about Trump the most, that I respect about him, is that I've always seen in my own experience that it's those people who have gone back...

Explore

Linked public records