Loading...

Now when you get back here, you're not going to KC2-PKG and then you get back to me. D.B.I.N.S.K. This is KC2-PKG. You know, you can look up socialism or communism if you want to, and you won't find a state that matches that definition. Certainly not, you know, countries that call themselves communist. I wouldn't put North Korea as any kind of communist state. I mean, Russia, they didn't make it work. China, because they started embracing different principles, became a production success. I mean, China's right about that. You know, we're all living in hybrid countries, is the point I'm making here. And they are tending to be more socialistic. But we have to be careful about how we define that. Because is everything shared socialism? Maybe. Maybe it is. But I certainly know that as far as human services and things like that, we're becoming more and more socialistic. We're looking for a better plan for everybody. A more equal, a more sharing culture. That we're stumbling our way in that direction, I think. So will we be pure socialists? No. That whole concept is gone. These are just the way we do things. Actually, I would argue that we're more tribal than possibly we should be. But we're more tribal. And are tribes socialistic combines? Yeah, they are. They are. Most primitive tribes. You know, they have, everybody's contributing. Everybody's part of the tribe. They do that. But does everybody get the same amount of meat or food or water? No, they don't. No, they do not. The guy who killed the buffalo gets the first bite. You know, there's all sorts of rules like that. So, you might think that violated the principles of socialism, but I'm not sure. It certainly doesn't violate the principles of the hybrid governments and organizations that we live in. Anyway, back to you, Russell, KB9, MSK. This is KC2, PT. And I go down to PT and take the effect of meat. That's it. Thank you, Russell.