Loading...

the sculpture wouldn't cause the image to deform. It would look more like a photocopy, similar to the Shroud of Turin. And because it shows only the region's potential direct contact without any real volume or depth. And rather than assuming the Shroud of Turin was a result of draping fabric on a human body, an explanation was created with that funerary context, making it a masterpiece, I'd say, of art. So although there's a remote possibility that it is an imprint of a three-dimensional human body, it's plausible to consider that artists or sculptors with sufficient knowledge could have created this piece through painting or low relief. And one expert thinks that this particular graphic artist is right, but his study's not particularly groundbreaking. So from a forest history, it's been known that the body image on a shroud is comparable to a orthogonal projection onto a plane. Orthogonal just needs perpendicular right angles to it. Which certainly could not have been created through contact of a three-dimensional body. And Andrea Nicolleti, who's a professor of history at the University of Turin, she put a report about this as well. So this graphic artist, he suggests that his method is an accessible or replicable, and that his work highlights the potential of digital technologies to address and revel historical mysteries. So there's another piece of research that comes out that gives a plausible explanation for the shroud of Turin.