Loading...

speed of which something's moving towards or away, directionality, et cetera. So they're able to take all these concepts, which in many cases are somewhat abstract, and they're able to categorically build them into their language, and they're able to use them to quantify something, right? So they have an idea of all these things. So it would make sense that they might be able to cognitively think about things that are not immediately here in the present in this moment, things that are more abstract in nature. I guess the problem is for researchers, they haven't really shown researchers how, if they do, they discuss these things. It might be something which is more visual, or it might be something, some other form of something that's non-linguistic in nature that they share that researchers have yet to discover. But no, prairie dogs are fascinating. OK, I think Ken's in there.