{"ai_pass_count":4,"analysis_step_count":9,"confidence":0.8238870417699218,"created_at":"2026-08-25T06:32:00.743412+00:00","id":253429,"node_number":"66296","processing_time":2.431365966796875,"recent_steps":["net.store_session","net.llm_structured_analysis","net.rules_detect","net.context_window","callsign.qrz_verify"],"recording_id":267623,"text":"the other direction, which is our direction. And it plays back again exactly according to this theory, a brand new theory. It's not junk science, it's new scientists, and interviewing a Nobel laureate who strongly thinks, he said, I could be wrong. I could be wrong. That's science. You could always be wrong. And if I'm wrong, I accept that. Beforehand, I accept my wrongness. But that's what the A.K.E. and his associates came up with. And it's not just a Lorentz attractor, which I thought of. That's why you could weird like deja vous, just like after images from adjacent cycles separated by 400 trillion, trillion quadrillion years. But according to this theory, it's exact. But I'm going to look up Brian Green. I've heard that name."}