Analysis step detail
Loading...
Public log view for one automated analysis step.
Model
Provider and model
Input
Input log
chars=696
Output
Output log
candidates=2 domains=psrg.org,hamnet.org
Metadata
Related data
{
"auto_dispatch": false,
"candidates": [
{
"confidence": 0.84,
"domain": "psrg.org",
"guess_source": "llm_3b",
"llm_name": "Puget Sound Repeater Group",
"llm_reason": "Ham radio club mentioned in the transcript",
"probe": {
"alive": true,
"final_host": "web.psrg.org",
"relevant": true,
"scheme": "https",
"status_code": 200,
"url": "https://web.psrg.org/"
},
"reason": "guessed_domain",
"source_text": "If you ask some people what they notice, they'll give you some global answer that you can't revise from to save your soul. And then the other extreme is to go to some nitpicky detail that's nice, but is again sort of below the level you want. I don't know. I'm finding the whole piece of coming up with a revision process that works to be unbelievably frustrating. Anyway, what that's about. Tomorrow I think I'll go up to Edmond and play some more, and that will be nice. And oth",
"url": "https://web.psrg.org/"
},
{
"confidence": 0.84,
"domain": "hamnet.org",
"guess_source": "llm_3b",
"llm_name": "Ham Radio Net",
"llm_reason": "Net mentioned in the transcript",
"probe": {
"alive": true,
"final_host": "hamnet.org",
"relevant": true,
"scheme": "http",
"status_code": 200,
"url": "http://hamnet.org/"
},
"reason": "guessed_domain",
"source_text": "If you ask some people what they notice, they'll give you some global answer that you can't revise from to save your soul. And then the other extreme is to go to some nitpicky detail that's nice, but is again sort of below the level you want. I don't know. I'm finding the whole piece of coming up with a revision process that works to be unbelievably frustrating. Anyway, what that's about. Tomorrow I think I'll go up to Edmond and play some more, and that will be nice. And oth",
"url": "http://hamnet.org/"
}
]
}